[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOAejn3cxJdXd4i2OQk_fUiZwzUd7-U7Fi-haHUsvWg4xu_uzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:31:31 +0100
From: "M'boumba Cedric Madianga" <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] i2c: Add STM32F4 I2C driver
Hello Uwe,
>> Is it possible to make it more obvious by doing:
>>
>> status = read_from_status_register() & read_from_interrupt_enable_register();
>>
>> at a single place?
Contrary to what I said previously I have to keep possible_status
variable as for one irq enabled we allow several events.
For example, ITBUFEN allows to generate an irq for RXNE and for TXE events.
So, using status = read_from_status_register() &
read_from_interrupt_enable_register(); is not possible.
Best regards,
Cedric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists