[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab87e239-6623-764b-998d-3d8148a6adf1@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 13:13:24 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: picoxcell - Fix module autoload for non-OF
registration
Hello Arnd,
On 01/02/2017 01:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, January 2, 2017 12:38:02 PM CET Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> If the driver is built as a module, autoload won't work because the module
>> alias information is not filled. So user-space can't match the registered
>> device with the corresponding module if the device isn't registered via OF.
>>
>> Export the module alias information using the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() macro.
>
> I think we can just remove the table, as the platform only supports
> booting through DT anyway.
>
Agreed. I should had checked if mach-picoxcell was DT-only indeed.
Should I also make the driver to depend on OF and remove the #ifdefery then?
> Arnd
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists