[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201701030431.CKnL8B72%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 04:32:37 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] seccomp: Create an action to audit before allowing
Hi Tyler,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc2 next-20161224]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Tyler-Hicks/seccomp-Create-an-action-to-audit-before-allowing/20170103-041342
config: i386-randconfig-x003-201701 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/seccomp.c: In function '__seccomp_filter':
>> kernel/seccomp.c:634:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'audit_seccomp_common' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
audit_seccomp_common(this_syscall, action);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/audit_seccomp_common +634 kernel/seccomp.c
628 if (__seccomp_filter(this_syscall, NULL, true))
629 return -1;
630
631 return 0;
632
633 case SECCOMP_RET_AUDIT:
> 634 audit_seccomp_common(this_syscall, action);
635 return 0;
636
637 case SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW:
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (25534 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists