linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM / docs: Drop confusing kernel-doc references from infrastructure.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170102153920.56c48a83@lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 2 Jan 2017 15:39:20 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / docs: Drop confusing kernel-doc references from
 infrastructure.rst

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:05:31 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:

> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > 
> > The references to drivers/base/power/main.c and
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c from Documentation/driver-api/infrastructure.rst
> > are confusing.  They both cause descriptions of functions that are
> > not relevant to device drivers at all to be generated and none of
> > them is sufficient to cover the API in a meaningful way.
> > 
> > Drop them for now.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>  
> 
> I'd like this to go into 4.10.
> 
> Are there any objections here?

None here.  Sorry, somehow I failed to see this when I was putting
together the fixes to send a few days ago.  If you want to include it in
a batch of yours, feel free to do so with my ack; otherwise I can ship it
Linusward in a bit.

Thanks,

jon