[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170103103634.GA25813@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:36:34 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...or.com
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/urgent] ktime: Get rid of the union
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 05:26:33AM -0800, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Commit-ID: 64dac5c9e0f5a933e4520f0cb689b7b143925207
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/64dac5c9e0f5a933e4520f0cb689b7b143925207
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> AuthorDate: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 11:38:40 +0100
> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CommitDate: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:11:50 +0100
>
> ktime: Get rid of the union
>
> ktime is a union because the initial implementation stored the time in
> scalar nanoseconds on 64 bit machine and in a endianess optimized timespec
> variant for 32bit machines. The Y2038 cleanup removed the timespec variant
> and switched everything to scalar nanoseconds. The union remained, but
> become completely pointless.
>
> Get rid of the union and just keep ktime_t as simple typedef of type s64.
All good stuff. One question that remains is why keep the type while
removing the cycles_t type?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists