[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7bfdbc5-cb9d-81ca-2300-a035098e5884@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:57:37 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@...sung.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
galaxyra@...il.com, beomho.seo@...sung.com,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: make tm2 and tm2e independent
from each other
Hello Andi,
On 01/03/2017 11:40 AM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> FWIW, I also agree with Chanwoo that the difference is too small to
>> need a common .dtsi file.
>
> in principle I don't like "switching on and off" properties by
> overwriting them with "status = disable", unless it's really
This is a very good point. It would had been different if it was the
opposite and tm2e had to enable the device node, but disabling it is
indeed more confusing.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists