[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v65GJFTnQZtWHCS7CAtA+Dry94o77aakPLr938BpQksLog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:52:12 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Hans De Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: sun50i: add MMC nodes
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com> wrote:
A commit message explaining the mmc controllers would be nice.
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> index e0dcab8..c680566 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> @@ -150,6 +150,32 @@
> pins = "PB8", "PB9";
> function = "uart0";
> };
> +
> + mmc0_pins: mmc0@0 {
> + pins = "PF0", "PF1", "PF2", "PF3", "PF4", "PF5";
> + function = "mmc0";
> + drive-strength = <30>;
> + };
> +
> + mmc0_default_cd_pin: mmc0_cd_pin@0 {
> + pins = "PF6";
> + function = "gpio_in";
> + bias-pull-up;
> + };
We are starting to drop pinmux nodes for gpio usage.
> +
> + mmc1_pins: mmc1@0 {
> + pins = "PG0", "PG1", "PG2", "PG3", "PG4", "PG5";
> + function = "mmc1";
> + drive-strength = <30>;
> + };
> +
> + mmc2_pins: mmc2@0 {
> + pins = "PC1", "PC5", "PC6", "PC8", "PC9",
> + "PC10", "PC11", "PC12", "PC13", "PC14",
> + "PC15", "PC16";
> + function = "mmc2";
> + drive-strength = <30>;
> + };
Moreover I think you should split out the pinmux nodes to a separate patch.
> };
>
> uart0: serial@...8000 {
> @@ -240,6 +266,47 @@
> #size-cells = <0>;
> };
>
> + mmc0: mmc@...f000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc",
> + "allwinner,sun5i-a13-mmc";
Given that sun5i doesn't support mmc delay timings, and the A64 has
calibration and delay timings, I wouldn't call them compatible.
Or are you claiming that for the A64 has a delay of 0 for the
currently supported speeds, so the calibration doesn't really
matter? If so this should be mentioned in the commit message.
> + reg = <0x01c0f000 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&ccu 31>, <&ccu 75>;
The clock / reset index macros are in the tree now.
Please switch to them.
ChenYu
> + clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> + resets = <&ccu 8>;
> + reset-names = "ahb";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 60 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + mmc1: mmc@...0000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc",
> + "allwinner,sun5i-a13-mmc";
> + reg = <0x01c10000 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&ccu 32>, <&ccu 76>;
> + clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> + resets = <&ccu 9>;
> + reset-names = "ahb";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 61 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + mmc2: mmc@...1000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-emmc";
> + reg = <0x01c11000 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&ccu 33>, <&ccu 77>;
> + clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> + resets = <&ccu 10>;
> + reset-names = "ahb";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 62 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> gic: interrupt-controller@...1000 {
> compatible = "arm,gic-400";
> reg = <0x01c81000 0x1000>,
> --
> 2.8.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists