linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] printk: always report lost messages on serial console

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2017 00:47:45 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] printk: always report lost messages on serial console

On (01/03/17 15:55), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> This causes the opposite problem. We might print a message that was supposed
> to be suppressed.

so what? yes, we print a message that otherwise would have been suppressed.
not a big deal. at all. we are under high printk load and the best thing
we can do is to report "we are losing the messages" straight ahead. the
next 'visible' message may be seconds/minutes/forever away. think of a
printk() flood of messages with suppressed loglevel coming from CPUA-CPUX,
big enough to drain all 'visible' loglevel messages from CPUZ. we are
back to problem "a".

thus I want a simple bool flag and a simple rule: we see something - we say it.

[..]
> The best solution seems to be to print the warning with
> the next visible message.

not sure.

	-ss