linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drop_monitor: consider inserted data in genlmsg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170103.111028.1485189939139437925.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:10:28 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     nhorman@...driver.com
Cc:     wr0112358@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop_monitor: consider inserted data in genlmsg_end

From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:04:43 -0500

> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:54:19AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Reiter Wolfgang <wr0112358@...il.com>
>> Date: Tue,  3 Jan 2017 01:39:10 +0100
>> 
>> > Final nlmsg_len field update must reflect inserted net_dm_drop_point
>> > data.
>> > 
>> > This patch depends on previous patch:
>> > "drop_monitor: add missing call to genlmsg_end"
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Reiter Wolfgang <wr0112358@...il.com>
>> 
>> I don't understand why the current code doesn't work properly.
>> 
>> All over the tree, the pattern is:
>> 
>> 	x = genlmsg_put(skb, ...);
>> 	...
>> 	genlmsg_end(skb, x);
>> 
>> And that is exactly what the code is doing right now.
>> 
> 
> Because reset_per_cpu_data should close the use of of the established skb
> that was being written to.  Without this patch we add the END tlv to the skb
> that is just getting started for use in the drop monitor, rather than for the
> skb that is getting returned for use in sending up to user space listeners.
> 
> Or am I missing something?

That's the critical part I didn't see, thanks for explaining.

Applied and queued up for -stabel, thanks.