linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V9 0/3] irqchip: qcom: Add IRQ combiner driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h_v-iER5Fffdoczj4CAhetGYqOfJOhdO561_kNCnsEFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jan 2017 22:56:40 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
        Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>, harba@...eaurora.org,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
        Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@...hat.com>,
        Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>, astone@...hat.com,
        Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
        Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        Charles Garcia Tobin <charles.garcia-tobin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/3] irqchip: qcom: Add IRQ combiner driver

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Agustin Vega-Frias
<agustinv@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any more feedback on this beyond Lorenzo's suggestion to drop
> the conditional check on the first patch?
> How can we move forward on this series?

Essentially, I need to convince myself that patches [1-2/3] are fine
which hasn't happened yet.

Thanks,
Rafael