[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJM-B3r7tF2Mdm3HjY_74_Jme=W7=L9-bvRNKM6eN7XJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:25:22 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@...gic.com>,
Sudarsana Kalluru <sudarsana.kalluru@...gic.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi/bfa: use designated initializers
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:05:15PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Prepare to mark sensitive kernel structures for randomization by making
>> sure they're using designated initializers. These were identified during
>> allyesconfig builds of x86, arm, and arm64, with most initializer fixes
>> extracted from grsecurity.
>
> Instead of further bloating the idiotic dispatch table just kill it off
> entirely:
Sounds fine to me! Is this going via your tree?
Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Nexus Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists