[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <702b01ba-5fcb-01a2-0bad-65ea9005b834@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:24:36 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 01/10] f2fs: reassign new segment for mode=lfs
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Otherwise we can remain wrong curseg->next_blkoff, resulting in fsck failure.
Could you explain more about this case?
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index be9e4d244d75..4e5ffe1d97e4 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1428,9 +1428,6 @@ void allocate_new_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> unsigned int old_segno;
> int i;
>
> - if (test_opt(sbi, LFS))
> - return;
> -
> for (i = CURSEG_HOT_DATA; i <= CURSEG_COLD_DATA; i++) {
> curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, i);
> old_segno = curseg->segno;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists