[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170104200705.050258605@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed,  4 Jan 2017 21:47:22 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 37/85] btrfs: make file clone aware of fatal signals
4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
commit 69ae5e4459e43e56f03d0987e865fbac2b05af2a upstream.
Indeed this just make the behavior similar to xfs when process has
fatal signals pending, and it'll make fstests/generic/298 happy.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |    5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -3813,6 +3813,11 @@ process_slot:
 		}
 		btrfs_release_path(path);
 		key.offset = next_key_min_offset;
+
+		if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+			ret = -EINTR;
+			goto out;
+		}
 	}
 	ret = 0;
 
Powered by blists - more mailing lists