[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a8b7318k.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:20:11 +1300
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Luis Ressel <aranea@...ah.de>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mount_pseudo(), sget() and MS_KERNMOUNT
Luis Ressel <aranea@...ah.de> writes:
> Hello,
>
> With Linux 4.8, the sget() function in fs/super.c got a new permission
> check: It now returns -EPERM if
> (!(flags & MS_KERNMOUNT) && !ns_capable(user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) .
>
> I presume the first half is intented to detect in-kernel mounts? If so,
> why doesn't mount_pseudo() (in fs/libfs.c) pass the MS_KERNMOUNT flag
> to sget()?
It looks like an oversight that has simply not mattered.
> This behaviour has caused a problem for me: During graphics driver
> initalization, drm_fs_inode_new() (in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c) calls
> simple_pin_fs(). The MS_KERNMOUNT flag is indeed passed down the
> call chain from there, but it is lost when mount_pseudo() is called, as
> that function doesn't take a 'flags' argument.
>
> Hence, the first part of the above permission check fails. (The second
> part also fails under some cicumstances due to a SELinux quirk, and
> therefore the initalization of my graphics driver doesn't succeed.)
I am concerned that perhaps there is some wrong context in here that is
causing SELinux to have problems.
Does this correct your symptoms?
Eric
diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
index e973cd51f126..28d6f35feed6 100644
--- a/fs/libfs.c
+++ b/fs/libfs.c
@@ -245,7 +245,8 @@ struct dentry *mount_pseudo_xattr(struct file_system_type *fs_type, char *name,
struct inode *root;
struct qstr d_name = QSTR_INIT(name, strlen(name));
- s = sget(fs_type, NULL, set_anon_super, MS_NOUSER, NULL);
+ s = sget_userns(fs_type, NULL, set_anon_super, MS_KERNMOUNT|MS_NOUSER,
+ &init_user_ns, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(s))
return ERR_CAST(s);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists