[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGt4E5st6RZwVXtLAa0Hm+H+O5qHqGWp9AqL4ri83AyEJ70r3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 15:04:54 -0800
From: Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@...adcom.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Markus Mayer <code@...yer.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ARM Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: errata: Check for --fix-cortex-a53-843419 and --fix-cortex-a53
On 4 January 2017 at 14:39, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 03:49 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:17:23PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 11/03/2016 10:20 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/2016 07:16 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>>> If you can't change toolchain and you want this worked around, why can't you
>>>>> either build gold with it enabled by default, or pass the extra flag on the
>>>>> command line to the kernel build system?
>>>>
>>>> Because that creates a distribution problem and now we have to document
>>>> this for people who want to build a kernel on their own, without
>>>> necessarily understanding if this is something they might need, or why
>>>> this is needed, and why the kernel is not taking care of that on its
>>>> own? So yes, this comes down to who is responsible for what, in that
>>>> case the kernel's Makefile is the best place where to put such knowledge
>>>> as to which workaround needs to be enabled by the linker and it
>>>> simplifies things a lot for people.
>>>
>>> Was this convincing enough for Catalin to pick Markus' patch or does
>>> that mean this patch needs to remain out of tree for us because of using
>>> a slightly older toolchain?
>>
>> I thought more about this last night, and there are two questions that
>> might sway me:
>>
>> 1. How prevalent is the binary toolchain with this issue? Is it, for
>> example, shipping as part of a publicly available LTS distribution?
>> I know you quoted some Linaro build, but I can't actually find those
>> binaries on their website.
>
> The toolchain is available for download from Broadcom's website at
> https://www.broadcom.com/support/download-search/?pg=Broadband:+CPE-Gateway,+Infrastructure,+and+Set-top+Box&pf=Set-top+Box+Solutions
> (working on the download agreement as we speak) and is used by the large
> majority of our customers today, it's hard to give you numbers, but
> several hundreds if not more people definitively use it AFAICT.
>
>>
>> 2. Could we extend the Makefile magic to detect that, not only is
>> --fix-cortex-a53-843419 unsupported, but also that the linker is
>> in fact gold?
>
> I suppose we could do that, Markus do you mind update your original
> patch? Thanks!
Hm. Unfortunately, the linker doesn't identify as "gold." I could try
to use "Linaro 2014" or similar from the version string as an
additional test, but I don't know if that would catch all cases. It
would certainly catch ours, so it may be good enough.
$ aarch64-linux-gnu-ld -v
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) Linaro 2014.11-2 2.24.0.20141017
$ aarch64-linux-gnu-ld --fix-cortex-a53-843419
aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: unrecognized option '--fix-cortex-a53-843419'
aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: use the --help option for usage information
$ aarch64-linux-gnu-ld --fix-cortex-a53
aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: no input files
Regards,
-Markus
> --
> Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists