[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hqsoFXvhhyzFAcoi238-dDPesm1-HkGuogJgxLfy2d3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 00:15:34 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] More ACPI updates for v4.10-rc1
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Please pull from the tag
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
>> acpi-extra-4.10-rc1
>
> I only just noticed that this apparently introduces a new warning:
>
> ACPI Warning: Table ffffffff9fe6c0a0, Validation count is zero
> before decrement
>
> the bug may be old, it looks like just the check is new to commit 174cc7187e6f.
>
> But it does seem like something is putting a table that wasn't properly gotten.
>
> Hmm?
It certainly seems so, but acpi_tb_put_table() and acpi_put_table()
are only used in a few places and all of them look correct by
inspection. Nothing obvious at least.
Is this on HW or emulation?
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists