linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] crypto: Add IV generation algorithms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHv-k_-n4sT_SqgpTfZwnyn-QsfEQBpjo43w-r+CHD=fYS7PKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:50:38 +0530
From:   Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>
To:     Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
Cc:     Oded <oded.golombek@....com>, Ofir <Ofir.Drang@....com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        Rajendra <rnayak@...eaurora.org>, gilad.benyossef@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] crypto: Add IV generation algorithms

Hi Gilad,

On 3 January 2017 at 19:53, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com> wrote:
> Good idea. I wanted to test the patch but alas it does not apply cleanly.
> You seem to have a blank line at the end of files and other small
> transgressions that makes checkpatch grumpy.

I think that is because there were some key structure changes in dm-crypt
after I sent out v2. I have resolved them while working on v3. Please wait for
the next version of the patchset. I'll send it probably by next week.
I wanted to incorporate a few changes suggested by Herbert before sending them.

> What is Not-signed-off-by ? :-)

It was just an RFC patch, not ready for merging.

Thanks,
Binoy