[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a13bbd2b-545e-284f-bb63-269309082c3e@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 14:35:02 +0800
From: hejianet <hejianet@...il.com>
To: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Daniel Cashman <dcashman@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] change the proc handler for nsm_use_hostnames
Ping, any comments are welcome. Thanks
B.R.
Jia
On 15/12/2016 3:24 PM, Jia He wrote:
> nsm_use_hostnames is a module parameter and it will be exported to sysctl
> procfs. This is to let user sometimes change it from userspace. But the
> minimal unit for sysctl procfs read/write it sizeof(int).
> In big endian system, the converting from/to bool to/from int will cause
> error for proc items.
>
> This patch introduces a new proc handler proc_dobool for nsm_use_hostnames.
>
> Changes:
> v5: Fix compilation error when CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL is not set
> v4: Change (u8 *) to (bool *)
> v3: Introduce a new proc handler proc_dou8vec(suggested by Xinhui Pan)
> v2: Change extern type in lockd.h
>
> The test case I used:
> /***************************************************************/
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/sysctl.h>
>
> bool __read_mostly nsm_use_hostnames;
> module_param(nsm_use_hostnames, bool, 0644);
>
> static struct ctl_table my_sysctl[] = {
> {
> .procname = "nsm_use_hostnames",
> .data = &nsm_use_hostnames,
> .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
> },
> {}
> };
>
> static struct ctl_table my_root[] = {
> {
> .procname = "mysysctl",
> .mode = 0555,
> .child = my_sysctl,
> },
> {}
> };
>
> static struct ctl_table_header * my_ctl_header;
>
> static int __init sysctl_exam_init(void)
> {
> my_ctl_header = register_sysctl_table(&my_root);
> if (my_ctl_header == NULL)
> printk("error regiester sysctl");
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static void __exit sysctl_exam_exit(void)
> {
> unregister_sysctl_table(my_ctl_header);
> }
>
> module_init(sysctl_exam_init);
> module_exit(sysctl_exam_exit);
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> /****************************************************************/
>
> [root@...endian my]# insmod -f /root/my/hello.ko nsm_use_hostnames=1
> [root@...endian my]# cat /proc/sys/mysysctl/nsm_use_hostnames
> 16777216
>
> After I change the proc_dointvec to new handler proc_dou8vec with the
> patch:
> [root@...endian my]# insmod -f /root/my/hello.ko nsm_use_hostnames=1
> [root@...endian my]# cat /proc/sys/mysysctl/nsm_use_hostnames
> 1
>
> In little endian system, there is no such issue.
> Already tested in both of big and little endian(ppc64 and ppc64le)
>
> Jia He (2):
> sysctl: introduce new proc handler proc_dobool
> lockd: change the proc_handler for nsm_use_hostnames
>
> fs/lockd/svc.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/sysctl.h | 2 ++
> kernel/sysctl.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists