[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49365234-2f2f-1607-e520-b98b61e1b5e9@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 15:56:15 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, Ma Jun <majun258@...wei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
charles.garcia-tobin@....com, huxinwei@...wei.com,
yimin@...wei.com, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/14] ACPI: ARM64: IORT: minor cleanup for
iort_match_node_callback()
Hi Lorenzo,
On 2017/1/3 22:08, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:31:32PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Cleanup iort_match_node_callback() a little bit to reduce
>> some lines of code, aslo fix the indentation in iort_scan_node().
>
> s/aslo/also
>
> "Also" in a commit log is a sign a patch should be split and that's what
> you should do even though I know it is tempting to merge all trivial
> changes into one single patch.
>
> Make it two patches please.
Will do, thanks!
Do you have more comments regarding this patch set? I will
incorporate all the comments and send out a new version.
Thanks
Hanjun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists