linux-kernel - Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:31:17 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+lkml@...gen.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [KERNEL] Re: [KERNEL] Re: Bug 4.9 and memorymanagement

On Wed 04-01-17 09:15:27, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> Am Mi den  4. Jan 2017 um  9:06 schrieb Michal Hocko:
> 
> > > Just try to run with the patch and do what you do normally. If you do
> > > not see any OOMs in few days it should be sufficient evidence. From your
> > > previous logs it seems you hit the problem quite early after few hours
> > > as far as I remember.
> > 
> > Did you have chance to run with the patch? I would like to post it for
> > inclusion and feedback from you is really useful.
> 
> Yes. It runs since 2017-01-01 and without problems until today.
> 
> I think it looks good but that is just my feeling. I don't know if it is
> to early to say that.
> 
> I also did some heavy git repository actions to big repositories. The
> system is in swap and still no OOMs.

OK, that is a good indication. I will add your Reported-by to the patch
and if you feel comfortable also Tested-by.

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs