lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170104091312.GA31129@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:13:12 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...eos.com>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow userspace to request device probing even if
 defer_all_probes is true

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 03:07:20PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...eos.com>
> 
> Userspace may wish to make a policy decision to allow certain devices
> to be attached, such as keyboards.

I don't understand what that sentance means.  Why wouldn't keyboards be
attached?

> Add a force_probe sysfs node to each device, which if written will
> trigger a probe even if defer_all_probes is currently true.

Why not just manually trigger the bind of the device?  I don't
understand the problem here that is being addressed, nor do I understand
how this would be used.  More explaination please.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ