lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170104001138.GA22030@char.us.oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jan 2017 19:11:38 -0500
From:   Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the swiotlb tree

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:57:49AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> After merging the swiotlb tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> net/bridge/br_input.o: In function `.swiotlb_max_segment':
> (.text+0x780): multiple definition of `.swiotlb_max_segment'
> net/bridge/br.o:br.c:(.text+0x3c0): first defined here
> 
> and many, many more :-(
> Caused by commit
> 
>   f196f1294fd2 ("swiotlb: Export swiotlb_max_segment to users")
> 
> Forgotten "static nline" in include/linux/swiotlb.h ...

Duh!

	Fixed it up and pushed the fix in. Thanks!
> 
> I have used the swiotlb tree from next-20170103 for today.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ