[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <o4h852$760$2@blaine.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:21:28 -0500
From: Ken Goldman <kgoldman@...ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] RFC: in-kernel resource manager
On 1/3/2017 4:47 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> I think we should also consider TPM 1.2 support in all of this, it is
> still a very popular piece of hardware and it is equally able to
> support a RM.
I suspect that TPM 2.0 and TPM 1.2 are so different that there may be
little or no code in common.
My immediate need is for a 2.0 resource manager, since it's a gap in the
technology, while 1.2 does have tcsd.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists