lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 08:55:34 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Bruno Faccini <bruno.faccini@...el.com>, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>, Vitaly Fertman <vitaly_fertman@...atex.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>, "John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@...el.com>, Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@...il.com>, Emoly Liu <emoly.liu@...el.com> Subject: Re: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing? On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 22:35:26 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: > For randstruct and constify, the automatic selection is done on > structures with only function pointers. (Additional structures can be > added via a compiler attribute marking.) > > See is_pure_ops_struct(): Is there anyway to use this plugin to identify pure_ops structures not already marked as const?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists