[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C246CAC1457055469EF09E3A7AC4E11A4A660958@XAP-PVEXMBX01.xlnx.xilinx.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 17:00:50 +0000
From: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"vinod.koul@...el.com" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
"michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@...inx.com>,
"moritz.fischer@...us.com" <moritz.fischer@...us.com>,
"laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com"
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
"luis@...ethencourt.com" <luis@...ethencourt.com>,
"Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com" <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2/3] dmaeninge: xilinx_dma: Fix bug in multiple frame
stores scenario in vdma
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the review....
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 07:05:53PM +0530, Kedareswara rao Appana wrote:
> > When VDMA is configured for more than one frame in the h/w for example
> > h/w is configured for n number of frames and user Submits n number of
> > frames and triggered the DMA using issue_pending API.
> > In the current driver flow we are submitting one frame at a time but
> > we should submit all the n number of frames at one time as the h/w Is
> > configured for n number of frames.
>
> Please fix run-on sentences, capitalization, and word wrapping.
Sure will fix in the next version....
[Snip]
-- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dma.txt
> > @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ Optional child node properties:
> > Optional child node properties for VDMA:
> > - xlnx,genlock-mode: Tells Genlock synchronization is
> > enabled/disabled in hardware.
> > +- xlnx,fstore-config: Tells Whether Frame Store Configuration is
> > + enabled/disabled in hardware.
>
> What's the default (when not present)? That should be the most common case.
> Looks like the code treats this as bool, but that's not clear here. The name is not
> clear what it is doing. Enabling or disabling the feature?
Default value is zero...
When this property is present it tells hardware is configured for frame store configuration.
Will fix the explanation part in the next version like below.
xlnx,fstore-config: Tells hardware is configured for frame store configuration.
Is the above explanation clear???
Regards,
Kedar.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists