lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:26:08 -0800
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] mfd: lm3533: Support initialization from Device
 Tree

On Wed 04 Jan 03:54 PST 2017, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Dec 2016, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> 
> > From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
> > 
> > Implement support for initialization of the lm3533 driver core and
> > probing child devices from Device Tree.
> > 

[..]

> > @@ -512,6 +514,11 @@ static int lm3533_device_init(struct lm3533 *lm3533)
> >  	lm3533_device_bl_init(lm3533);
> >  	lm3533_device_led_init(lm3533);
> >  
> > +	if (lm3533->dev->of_node) {
> > +		of_platform_populate(lm3533->dev->of_node, NULL, NULL,
> > +				     lm3533->dev);
> > +	}
> 
> I think it's save to call of_platform_populate(), even if !of_node.
> It will just fail and return an error code, which you are ignoring
> anyway.
> 

I thought so too, but that's apparently how you trigger probing children
of the root node. So we're stuck with a conditional.

[..]

> >  static int lm3533_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> >  					const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> >  {

[..]

> >  
> > +	if (i2c->dev.of_node) {
> 
> I'd prefer this check to be placed in lm3533_pdata_from_of_node().
> 
> Just return silently if !dev->of_node.
> 

I agree, will update this.

> > +		ret = lm3533_pdata_from_of_node(lm3533->dev);
> > +		if (ret < 0)
> > +			return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	return lm3533_device_init(lm3533);
> >  }
> >  

Regards,
Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists