lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f33cbfd-44f2-9bed-3b66-7446cd14256f@ce.jp.nec.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2017 04:45:18 +0000
From:   Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
To:     "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Use correct buffer size for saving
 microcode data

On 01/05/17 10:02, Junichi Nomura wrote:
> In generic_load_microcode(), curr_mc_size is the size of the last
> allocated buffer and not always the size of the buffer pointed to by
> "new_mc".
...
> @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,
>  			vfree(new_mc);
>  			new_rev = mc_header.rev;
>  			new_mc  = mc;
> +			new_mc_size  = curr_mc_size;
>  			mc = NULL;	/* trigger new vmalloc */

Oops, sorry. It should save "mc_size", not "curr_mc_size".

-------------------
In generic_load_microcode(), curr_mc_size is the size of the last
allocated buffer and could be smaller than the actual size of the
buffer pointed to by "new_mc".

Without this fix, we could get oops like this:

  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc9000e30f000
  IP: __memcpy+0x12/0x20
  ...
  Call Trace:
  ? kmemdup+0x43/0x60
  __alloc_microcode_buf+0x44/0x70
  save_microcode_patch+0xd4/0x150
  generic_load_microcode+0x1b8/0x260
  request_microcode_user+0x15/0x20
  microcode_write+0x91/0x100
  __vfs_write+0x34/0x120
  vfs_write+0xc1/0x130
  SyS_write+0x56/0xc0
  do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x160
  entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

Save "mc_size" and use it for save_mc_for_early().

Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Fixes: 06b8534cb728 ("x86/microcode: Rework microcode loading")

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index faec8fa..aee3cb5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,
 	u8 *ucode_ptr = data, *new_mc = NULL, *mc = NULL;
 	int new_rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
 	unsigned int leftover = size;
-	unsigned int curr_mc_size = 0;
+	unsigned int curr_mc_size = 0, new_mc_size = 0;
 	unsigned int csig, cpf;
 
 	while (leftover) {
@@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,
 			vfree(new_mc);
 			new_rev = mc_header.rev;
 			new_mc  = mc;
+			new_mc_size = mc_size;
 			mc = NULL;	/* trigger new vmalloc */
 		}
 
@@ -889,7 +890,7 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,
 	 * permanent memory. So it will be loaded early when a CPU is hot added
 	 * or resumes.
 	 */
-	save_mc_for_early(new_mc, curr_mc_size);
+	save_mc_for_early(new_mc, new_mc_size);
 
 	pr_debug("CPU%d found a matching microcode update with version 0x%x (current=0x%x)\n",
 		 cpu, new_rev, uci->cpu_sig.rev);
-- 
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation / NEC Solution Innovators, Ltd.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ