linux-kernel - RE: [GIT PULL] More ACPI updates for v4.10-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E886CE21707@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2017 05:11:30 +0000
From:   "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
To:     "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
CC:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [GIT PULL] More ACPI updates for v4.10-rc1

Hi,

> From: linux-acpi-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-acpi-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Zhang
> Rui
> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] More ACPI updates for v4.10-rc1
> 
> On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 09:46 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Please pull from the tag
> > >
> > >  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git
> > > \
> > >  acpi-extra-4.10-rc1
> > I only just noticed that this apparently introduces a new warning:
> >
> >   ACPI Warning: Table ffffffff9fe6c0a0, Validation count is zero
> > before decrement
> >
> > the bug may be old, it looks like just the check is new to commit
> > 174cc7187e6f.
> >
> > But it does seem like something is putting a table that wasn't
> > properly gotten.
> >
> this looks like the same issue reported here
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=191221
> 
> Lv, do you think the patch in comment #4 can fix the problem?

Yes, I think so.
If it cannot, we need to further get the stack of the warning and review the caller side code.

Thanks
Lv

> 
> thanks,
> rui
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html