[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <c62a8f8b1bf699b0c7834c87096d4f144c02bf1d.1483596168.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:34:30 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: processor_perflib: Simplify code and stop using CPUFREQ_START
acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() can live without using CPUFREQ_START
(which is gonna be removed soon). Simplify it a bit.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
Rebased over: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148359167516831&w=2
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index f0b4a981b8d3..1ceea1143a1c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -75,14 +75,12 @@ static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
struct acpi_processor *pr;
unsigned int ppc = 0;
- if (event == CPUFREQ_START && ignore_ppc <= 0) {
- ignore_ppc = 0;
- return 0;
- }
-
if (ignore_ppc)
return 0;
+ if (ignore_ppc < 0)
+ ignore_ppc = 0;
+
if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST)
return 0;
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists