[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170105010121.GB480@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:01:21 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 5/8] printk: report lost messages in printk safe/nmi
contexts
On (01/04/17 15:46), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2016-12-27 23:16:08, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Account lost messages in pritk-safe and printk-safe-nmi
> > contexts and report those numbers during printk_safe_flush().
> >
> > The patch also moves lost message counter to struct
> > `printk_safe_seq_buf' instead of having dedicated static
> > counters - this simplifies the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
>
> I like that the handling is localized in printk_safe.c and that
> the warning is printed right after the messages that fit the buffer.
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
thanks.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists