[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170105080701.GJ24225@dell>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 08:07:01 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: arizona: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout instead
of hard coding it
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:
> arizona_poll_reg essentially hard-codes regmap_read_poll_timeout, this
> patch updates the implementation to use regmap_read_poll_timeout. We
> still keep arizona_poll_reg around as regmap_read_poll_timeout is a
> macro so rather than expand this for each caller keep it wrapped in
> arizona_poll_reg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 28 +++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> index 4cb34c3..e6fae3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> @@ -236,28 +236,22 @@ static irqreturn_t arizona_overclocked(int irq, void *data)
> }
>
> static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
> - int timeout, unsigned int reg,
> + int npolls, unsigned int reg,
> unsigned int mask, unsigned int target)
> {
> + const int poll_us = 7500;
Get rid of this and replace its usage with a nice #define describing
exactly what the timeout is for i.e what timed out.
... okay, I just read the doc. This should really be 'SLEEP'.
Where did 7500 come from anyway? Is it documented?
> unsigned int val = 0;
> - int ret, i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
> - ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap, reg, &val);
> - if (ret != 0) {
> - dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg 0x%x: %d\n",
> - reg, ret);
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> - if ((val & mask) == target)
> - return 0;
> + int ret;
>
> - usleep_range(1000, 5000);
> - }
> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(arizona->regmap,
> + ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5, val,
> + ((val & mask) == target), poll_us,
> + npolls * poll_us);
What's the relevance of npolls? Is this number documented, or was it
pulled from your ... err, the air?
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n",
> + reg, val);
>
> - dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n", reg, val);
> - return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int arizona_wait_for_boot(struct arizona *arizona)
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists