lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pok1hdlt.fsf@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:53:50 +0100
From:   Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:     Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "x86\@kernel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-efi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/efi: don't allocate memmap through memblock after mm_init()

Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> writes:
> On 5 January 2017 at 10:15, Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com> wrote:
>> So, are you Ok with only taking the other review comment, namely
>>
>>   "modify efi_fake_memmap() to use your new efi_memmap_alloc() function
>>    for consistency"
>>
>> into account for a v3?
>>
>
> Yes, that should be sufficient for a fix that can be backported.
> Anything else can wait for now


Ard, thanks for your help!

v3 is here:

  http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170105125130.2815-1-nicstange@gmail.com


Nicolai

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ