[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pok1hdlt.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:53:50 +0100
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86\@kernel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-efi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/efi: don't allocate memmap through memblock after mm_init()
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> writes:
> On 5 January 2017 at 10:15, Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com> wrote:
>> So, are you Ok with only taking the other review comment, namely
>>
>> "modify efi_fake_memmap() to use your new efi_memmap_alloc() function
>> for consistency"
>>
>> into account for a v3?
>>
>
> Yes, that should be sufficient for a fix that can be backported.
> Anything else can wait for now
Ard, thanks for your help!
v3 is here:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170105125130.2815-1-nicstange@gmail.com
Nicolai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists