linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <20170105134104.zzjdirdiuqj6efyy@gangnam.samsung>
Date:   Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:41:04 +0900
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, krzk@...nel.org,
        javier@....samsung.com, kgene@...nel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a
 supporter

Hi Daniel,

> > +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
> > +M:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> > +R:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
> > +L:	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > +S:	Supported
> > +F:	arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
> > +
> 
> Does it make sense to add a MAINTAINER entry for some dts files ?

I think it does considering that exynos5433* files are more then
the half of the arm64/.../exynos/ directory.

Besides Chanwoo has authored all of them (almost) and doesn't
appear from the get_maintainers script.

Considering also that we are continuosly developing and
maintaining exynos5433 and we can test, review and compare with
the documents I think it makes more sense.

Thanks,
Andi