linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKOXPdFtq6GNU0Z1zn2Z3_OzqeHd6MK6ByYbpVpsP+AF4z+qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:19:21 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        kgene@...nel.org, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add EXYNOS5433 ARM architectures entry as a supporter

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:12:49PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch adds the 'ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES' entry
>> in order to review and test the upcoming patches as a supporter.
>> I have developed the low-level devices and power related devices for
>> Exyno5433 and TM2/E board.
>>
>> Moreover, Andi proposed himself as a reviewer for Exynos5433 and TM2/E.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index cfff2c9e3d94..96c055e8dd0b 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -1712,6 +1712,13 @@ F:     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/samsung-sram.txt
>>  F:   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.txt
>>  N:   exynos
>>
>> +ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS5433 ARM ARCHITECTURES
>> +M:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>> +R:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
>> +L:   linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
>> +S:   Supported
>> +F:   arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433*
>> +
>
> Review and testing is always highly appreciated and you are doing,
> Chanwoo, great work. I would like to sincerely thank you for that.
> Samsung probably should thank you, as well. :)
>
> As for the additional sub-entry, I do not see any need for creating
> such entries for specific DTSes. This looks like overkill.
>
> At the same time I would like to strongly avoid something which is
> happening for example in our DRM where we have *four* maintainers but
> only *one* is responding. We can add bazilions of maintainers to satisfy
> Samsung KPIs but still this might not help reviewing patches (damn, why
> am I waiting with this small [0] thing since 21st of October?).
>
> On the other hand, this is just my personal opinion. If the broad
> open-source community would like to do any changes here
> (add/remove/move/whatever) I do not mind at all.

Ah, forgot the link:
[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9391635/

Krzysztof