[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXUB8AeEzJ-WtW3kW9c189AcOe+GBq8TE7GPE+xrvXS8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:54:30 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"0x7f454c46@...il.com" <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] mm: remove unused TASK_SIZE_OF()
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:51 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> From: Dmitry Safonov
>> Sent: 30 December 2016 15:57
>> All users of TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) have migrated to mm->task_size or
>> TASK_SIZE_MAX since:
>> commit d696ca016d57 ("x86/fsgsbase/64: Use TASK_SIZE_MAX for
>> FSBASE/GSBASE upper limits"),
>> commit a06db751c321 ("pagemap: check permissions and capabilities at
>> open time"),
> ...
>> +#define TASK_SIZE (current->thread.task_size)
>
> I'm not sure I like he hidden 'current' argument to an
> apparent constant.
Me neither. But this patch is merely changing the implementation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists