[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170105202421.GA3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:24:21 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, davidcc@...gle.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kan.liang@...el.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Set pmu->module in Intel PMU modules
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:46:30AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > The first time I saw this I thought about doing something like the
> > below, but never got around to testing if that works and subsequently
> > forgot about things again.
> >
> > Does this make sense and or work?
>
> I'd argue against it.
Fair enough; /me files it in the bit-bucket.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists