linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] vring: Force use of DMA API for ARM-based systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrXMFHPxAx=ZTYLe9iKPNGfTPEEdis3mn3pphHYpD2h9+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:51:19 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vring: Force use of DMA API for ARM-based systems

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
> On 06/01/17 17:48, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>> Hi Will,
>>
>> On 20/12/16 15:14, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> Booting Linux on an ARM fastmodel containing an SMMU emulation results
>>> in an unexpected I/O page fault from the legacy virtio-blk PCI device:
>>>
>>> [    1.211721] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: event 0x10 received:
>>> [    1.211800] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu:    0x00000000fffff010
>>> [    1.211880] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu:    0x0000020800000000
>>> [    1.211959] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu:    0x00000008fa081002
>>> [    1.212075] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu:    0x0000000000000000
>>> [    1.212155] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu: event 0x10 received:
>>> [    1.212234] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu:    0x00000000fffff010
>>> [    1.212314] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu:    0x0000020800000000
>>> [    1.212394] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu:    0x00000008fa081000
>>> [    1.212471] arm-smmu-v3 2b400000.smmu:    0x0000000000000000
>>>
>>> <system hangs failing to read partition table>
>>>
>>> This is because the virtio-blk is behind an SMMU, so we have consequently
>>> swizzled its DMA ops and configured the SMMU to translate accesses. This
>>> then requires the vring code to use the DMA API to establish translations,
>>> otherwise all transactions will result in fatal faults and termination.
>>>
>>> Given that ARM-based systems only see an SMMU if one is really present
>>> (the topology is all described by firmware tables such as device-tree or
>>> IORT), then we can safely use the DMA API for all virtio devices.
>>
>> There is a problem with the platform block device on that same model.
>> Since it's not behind the SMMU, the DMA ops fall back to swiotlb, which
>> limits the number of mappings.
>>
>> It used to work with 4.9, but since 9491ae4 ("mm: don't cap request size
>> based on read-ahead setting") unlocked read-ahead, we quickly run into
>> the limit of swiotlb and panic:
>>
>> [    5.382359] virtio-mmio 1c130000.virtio_block: swiotlb buffer is full
>> (sz: 491520 bytes)
>> [    5.382452] virtio-mmio 1c130000.virtio_block: DMA: Out of SW-IOMMU
>> space for 491520 bytes
>> [    5.382531] Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Random memory could be
>> DMA written
>> ...
>> [    5.383148] [<ffff0000083ad754>] swiotlb_map_page+0x194/0x1a0
>> [    5.383226] [<ffff000008096bb8>] __swiotlb_map_page+0x20/0x88
>> [    5.383320] [<ffff0000084bf738>] vring_map_one_sg.isra.1+0x70/0x88
>> [    5.383417] [<ffff0000084c04fc>] virtqueue_add_sgs+0x2ec/0x4e8
>> [    5.383505] [<ffff00000856d99c>] __virtblk_add_req+0x9c/0x1a8
>> ...
>> [    5.384449] [<ffff0000081829c4>] ondemand_readahead+0xfc/0x2b8
>>
>> Commit 9491ae4 caps the read-ahead request to a limit set by the backing
>> device. For virtio-blk, it is infinite (as set by the call to
>> blk_queue_max_hw_sectors in virtblk_probe).
>>
>> I'm not sure how to fix this. Setting an arbitrary sector limit in the
>> virtio-blk driver seems unfair to other users. Maybe we should check if
>> the device is behind a hardware IOMMU before using the DMA API?
>
> Hmm, this looks more like the virtio_block device simply has the wrong
> DMA mask to begin with. For virtio-pci we set the streaming DMA mask to
> 64 bits - should a platform device not be similarly capable?

If it's not, then turning off DMA API will cause random corruption.
ISTM one way or another the bug is in either the DMA ops or in the
driver initialization.

--Andy