lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 7 Jan 2017 01:43:31 +0200
From:   Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com, Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: helper function to detect slave mode

On 01/07/2017 12:45 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com> wrote:
>>> +     if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
>>
>> IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_OF) looks excessive, check for non-NULL dev->of_node
>> should be sufficient.
> 
> Sorry, but you missed the point.
> This will enable compile time optimization and basically be collapsed to no-op.
> 

Good point, do you plan to add more "IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_OF)" checks all
over the code to reduce the size of the built image? 

>>> +             }
>>> +     } else if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ACPI) && ACPI_HANDLE(dev)) {
>>> +             dev_dbg(dev, "ACPI slave is not supported yet\n");
>>> +     }
>>
>> If so, then it might be better to drop else-if stub for now.
> 
> Please, don't.
> 

Why do you ask for this stub to be added?

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ