[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5788d1d-c951-0fc3-eed8-88457df1f27e@mleia.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 01:43:31 +0200
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com, Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: helper function to detect slave mode
On 01/07/2017 12:45 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com> wrote:
>>> + if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
>>
>> IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_OF) looks excessive, check for non-NULL dev->of_node
>> should be sufficient.
>
> Sorry, but you missed the point.
> This will enable compile time optimization and basically be collapsed to no-op.
>
Good point, do you plan to add more "IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_OF)" checks all
over the code to reduce the size of the built image?
>>> + }
>>> + } else if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ACPI) && ACPI_HANDLE(dev)) {
>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "ACPI slave is not supported yet\n");
>>> + }
>>
>> If so, then it might be better to drop else-if stub for now.
>
> Please, don't.
>
Why do you ask for this stub to be added?
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists