linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM64: dts: exynos5433: use macros for pinctrl configuration on Exynos5433

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:18:05 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM64: dts: exynos5433: use macros for pinctrl
 configuration on Exynos5433

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 11:23:43AM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> > Andi,
> > Please fix missing Signed-off-by and resend with Linus' tags for #1 and
> > #2 and with other accumulated tags.
> 
> patch #1 has already been merged in mainline:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=1259feddd0f83649d5c48d730c140b4f7f3fa288
> 
> and patch #2 is in LinusW's -next branch.

Yes, but it is gone from devel so I suppose it will be removed from
for-next in the future as well.

> does it still make sense to send them again? If you want I can
> send again patch 3 and 4 as independent patches with Chanwoo's
> review (the only tags).

No, no need. I wanted resend only because of #1 but it is merged as you
said.

Best regards,
Krzysztof