lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20170106081806.h4y7o57kjbibau6l@gangnam.samsung>
Date:   Fri, 06 Jan 2017 17:18:06 +0900
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
To:     Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>
Cc:     Hoegeun Kwon <hoegeun.kwon@...sung.com>, robh@...nel.org,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, airlied@...ux.ie, kgene@...nel.org,
        krzk@...nel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, a.hajda@...sung.com,
        cw00.choi@...sung.com, jh80.chung@...sung.com,
        Donghwa Lee <dh09.lee@...sung.com>,
        Hyungwon Hwang <human.hwang@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] drm/panel: Add support for S6E3HA2 panel driver on
 TM2 board

Hi Inki,

Thanks for the reply, but...

> >> +static const struct drm_display_mode default_mode = {
> >> +	.clock = 222372,
> >> +	.hdisplay = 1440,
> >> +	.hsync_start = 1440 + 1,
> >> +	.hsync_end = 1440 + 1 + 1,
> >> +	.htotal = 1440 + 1 + 1 + 1,
> >> +	.vdisplay = 2560,
> >> +	.vsync_start = 2560 + 1,
> >> +	.vsync_end = 2560 + 1 + 1,
> >> +	.vtotal = 2560 + 1 + 1 + 15,
> >> +	.vrefresh = 60,
> >> +	.flags = 0,
> >> +};
> > 
> > how is this working with tm2e? Are these values valid for both
> > the boards?
> 
> We don't need to consider tm2e board with two reasones,
> 1. there is no tm2e board support in mainline
> 2. the panel on tm2 would be a little bit different from one on tm2e

... this display in the Tizen Kernel is supported by both:
tm2 [1] and tm2e [2]. The only differences are:

TM2:
   clock-frequency = <14874444>;
   hactive = <1440>;

TM2E:
   clock-frequency = <16523724>;
   hactive = <1600>;

I don't know much about the differences you mention in point 2,
but it's a pity to drop support only because we don't want to put
in the dts the 'hactive', and 'clock-frequency' properties.

Andi

[1] https://git.tizen.org/cgit/platform/kernel/linux-exynos/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts?h=tizen#n1284
[2] https://git.tizen.org/cgit/platform/kernel/linux-exynos/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2e.dts?h=tizen#n1270

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ