lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:25:41 +0900
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@...sung.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, beomho.seo@...sung.com,
        galaxyra@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: dts: exynos: make tm2 and tm2e independent
 from each other

Hi Krzysztof,

> > > >  .../boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi     | 1118 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts      | 1153 +-------------------
> > > 
> > > Like talking to a wall. Without any feedback. If my instructions were
> > > wrong (and it is not possible to detect rename) then please say it (you
> > > can add personal comments after separator ---).
> > 
> > no Krzysztof, I'm sorry, but this patch has been formatted with
> > the diff algorithm *you* asked, -B50% both version 2 (where you
> > didn't comment) and version 3. If you still don't like it, please
> > don't blame me, blame the algorithm.
> 
> If you wrote it in cover letter or after '---' I wouldn't complain
> because I would know that my feedback was ignored. But here it is like
> black hole - I do not know whether I was ignored or it was not working.

In the cover letter is written:

 "- patch 3 diff has been generated with -B50%"

in "Changes in v2:". In v3 patch 3 has become patch 2.

> > Now we can stay here at trying random diff algorithms (as they
> > give more or less the same result) or you tell me which exact
> > algorithm you want me to use. Besides, for me it's clear,
> > tm2-common is all new, while in tm2 you have on one side the '-'
> > (if it applies nothing has changed) on the bottom the '+'.
> 
> Maybe that depends on the git?
> $ git --version 
> git version 2.9.3
> $ git format-patch -2 -B50%
> ...
>   21  ...ynos5433-tm2.dts => exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi} |   24 +-
>   22  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts      | 1153 +-------------------
>   23  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2e.dts     |   22 +-
>   24  3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1143 deletions(-)
>   25  copy arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/{exynos5433-tm2.dts => exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi} (98%)
>   26  rewrite arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts (98%)

I guess you're right, this has been generated from Jaechul's PC
who perhaps has a different version. I have version 2.11.0 and I
have same output as you.

I will send the patch generated from my PC as reply to your mail.

Andi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists