[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170105235957.jfoffcnlqqpw36vp@earth>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:59:57 +0100
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To: Chris Lapa <chris@...a.com.au>
Cc: pali.rohar@...il.com, afd@...com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] power: supplies: bq275xx: rename BQ27500 allow
for deprecation in future.
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:04:57AM +1100, Chris Lapa wrote:
> From: Chris Lapa <chris@...a.com.au>
>
> The BQ275XX definition exists only to satisfy backwards compatibility.
>
> tested: yes
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Lapa <chris@...a.com.au>
>
> [...]
>
> static bool bq27xxx_battery_overtemp(struct bq27xxx_device_info *di, u16 flags)
> {
> - if (di->chip == BQ27500 || di->chip == BQ27541 || di->chip == BQ27545)
> + if (di->chip == BQ275XX || di->chip == BQ27541 || di->chip == BQ27545)
> return flags & (BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTC | BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTD);
> if (di->chip == BQ27530 || di->chip == BQ27421)
> return flags & BQ27XXX_FLAG_OT;
This is really getting out of hands in this patchset. Please
add a patch at the beginning of the patchset, which converts
this construct into the following:
switch (di->chip) {
case A:
case B:
case C:
case D:
return flags & (BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTC | BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTD);
case E:
case F:
return flags & BQ27XXX_FLAG_OT;
default:
return false;
}
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists