linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 13/15] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170106210444.o35ajlxnfow27p33@treble>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2017 15:04:44 -0600
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc:     Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/15] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency
 model

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:34:57AM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> 
> > @@ -740,6 +809,14 @@ int klp_register_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> >  
> >  	/*
> > +	 * Architectures without reliable stack traces have to set
> > +	 * patch->immediate because there's currently no way to patch kthreads
> > +	 * with the consistency model.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!klp_have_reliable_stack() && !patch->immediate)
> > +		return -ENOSYS;
> > +
> 
> I think an error message (pr_err) would be appropriate here. 
> 
> $ insmod patch_1.ko
> insmod: ERROR: could not insert module patch_1.ko: Function not implemented
> 
> is not helpful much :)

Ok :-)

-- 
Josh