[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeCADf9bSHZfFrCFeOwWvyr7hOjEBgUNEDAjTtsD39UFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 23:32:12 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com, Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: helper function to detect slave mode
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Luis Oliveira
<Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com> wrote:
> On 06-Jan-17 17:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Luis Oliveira
>> <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com> wrote:
>>> On 06-Jan-17 16:29, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Luis Oliveira
>>
>>>> Please, add kernel doc description here, important thing is to explain
>>>> return codes in Return: section of it.
>>>>
>>>>> +int i2c_slave_mode_detect(struct device *dev)
>>
>> Just to make sure you didn't miss this one.
>>
>>
> Yes, I saw it. You were talking of something like this, right?
>
> /**
> * i2c_slave_mode_detect - detect operation mode
> * @dev: The device owning the bus
> *
> * This checks the device nodes for a I2C slave by checking the address
a -> an
> * used.
> *
> * Returns true if a I2C slave is detected, otherwise returns false.
It has int type and I would reword this accordingly.
Something like
* Return:
* 1 when an I2C slave is detected, 0 for I2C master mode,
* and negative error otherwise.
> */
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists