[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170108192634.GM1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:26:34 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xfs: commit 6552321831dc "xfs: remove i_iolock and use i_rwsem
in the VFS inode instead" change causes hang
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 08:09:55PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> No. We need an ->ima_measure file_operation, guts of process_measurement
> turned into a library function that the FS can call after taking fs-specific
> locks. And maybe also a small wrapper around it that takes ilock and
> can be used directly for file systems not needing special locking.
Incidentally, it had been literally years since the problems with their
pathname handling had been brought up and we *still* have got no answer.
In the current tree, ima_d_path() is quite capable of returning
path->dentry->d_name.name. Which gets used by subsequent code,
even though there is no warranty whatsoever that it won't be
pointing to freed memory by the time the caller of ima_d_path()
gets it.
Could IMA folks be bothered to explain how the hell is that supposed to
work? Note that the race window is *not* narrow - it includes reading the
file contents, for fuck sake! A plenty of time for the file to be
renamed, and if the name had been long enough to be stored separately,
for the original to be freed/reused/whatnot.
Better yet, in ima_collect_measurement() they have another user of
->d_name.name, with all the same issues.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists