[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc2ff1c9-c309-d63f-e868-d6cbdf65743a@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 10:25:04 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/12] dt-bindings: simplified bindings for single-user
gpio mux
On 04/01/17 12:16, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Looks neat and tidy to me.
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mux/mux-controller.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/mux-controller.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/mux-controller.txt
> index 42b2177e5ae1..4e89df8b2392 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/mux-controller.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/mux-controller.txt
> @@ -125,3 +125,29 @@ An example mux controller might look like this:
> reg = <0x50>;
> #mux-control-cells = <1>;
> };
> +
> +
> +Combinded controller and consumer of a GPIO mux
> +-----------------------------------------------
> +
> +For the common case of a single consumer of a GPIO controlled mux, there is
> +a simplified binding which will instantiate an implicit mux controller. Just
> +specify a mux-gpios property with the same interpretation as in mux-gpio.txt.
> +Note that other properties described in mux-gpio.txt are not available in
> +this simplified form and that the mux controller is unnamed. If you need
> +more than one mux controller, a shared mux controller or if you need a
> +specific idle-state, use the more flexible binding with the mux controller
> +in its own node.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + adc-mux {
> + compatible = "io-channel-mux";
> + io-channels = <&adc 0>;
> + io-channel-names = "parent";
> +
> + mux-gpios = <&pioA 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>,
> + <&pioA 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +
> + channels = "sync-1", "in", "out", "sync-2";
> + };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists