[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1483943091-1364-18-git-send-email-jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 01:24:13 -0500
From: Jintack Lim <jintack@...columbia.edu>
To: christoffer.dall@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
vladimir.murzin@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, james.morse@....com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, kevin.brodsky@....com,
wcohen@...hat.com, shankerd@...eaurora.org, geoff@...radead.org,
andre.przywara@....com, eric.auger@...hat.com,
anna-maria@...utronix.de, shihwei@...columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jintack@...columbia.edu
Subject: [RFC 17/55] KVM: arm64: Trap SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1 and VBAR_EL1 in virtual EL2
For the same reason we trap virtual memory register accesses in virtual
EL2, we need to trap SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1 and VBAR_EL1 accesses. ARM v8.3
introduces the HCR_EL2.NV1 bit to be able to trap on those register
accesses in EL1. Do not set this bit until the whole nesting support is
complete.
Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@...columbia.edu>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 0f5d21b..19d6a6e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -898,6 +898,38 @@ static bool access_cntp_cval(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return true;
}
+static inline void access_rw(struct sys_reg_params *p, u64 *sysreg)
+{
+ if (!p->is_write)
+ p->regval = *sysreg;
+ else
+ *sysreg = p->regval;
+}
+
+static bool access_elr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct sys_reg_params *p,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+ access_rw(p, &vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.elr_el1);
+ return true;
+}
+
+static bool access_spsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct sys_reg_params *p,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+ access_rw(p, &vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.spsr[KVM_SPSR_EL1]);
+ return true;
+}
+
+static bool access_vbar(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct sys_reg_params *p,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+ access_rw(p, &vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg));
+ return true;
+}
+
static bool trap_el2_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct sys_reg_params *p,
const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
@@ -1013,6 +1045,13 @@ static bool trap_el2_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
{ Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b0010), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b010),
access_vm_reg, reset_val, TCR_EL1, 0 },
+ /* SPSR_EL1 */
+ { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b0100), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b000),
+ access_spsr},
+ /* ELR_EL1 */
+ { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b0100), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b001),
+ access_elr},
+
/* AFSR0_EL1 */
{ Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b0101), CRm(0b0001), Op2(0b000),
access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, AFSR0_EL1 },
@@ -1045,7 +1084,7 @@ static bool trap_el2_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
/* VBAR_EL1 */
{ Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b1100), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b000),
- NULL, reset_val, VBAR_EL1, 0 },
+ access_vbar, reset_val, VBAR_EL1, 0 },
/* ICC_SGI1R_EL1 */
{ Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b1100), CRm(0b1011), Op2(0b101),
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists