[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170109091336.655d27c8@mschwideX1>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:13:36 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] vtime: Delay cputime accounting to tick / context
switch
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 18:11:40 +0100
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> This version is a rebase on top of latest Linus tree which includes
> the fix 8f2b468aadc ("s390/vtime: correct system time accounting").
>
> Also a small change: I have moved account_system_index_scaled() to s390
> in patch "s390/cputime: delayed accounting of system time" because it is
> the only user of the function.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> vtime/acc-v2
That looks good, I get sensible numbers for s390. Thanks for doing this!
For the s390 parts:
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists