lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170109094801.bkif6komfepc3rcx@techsingularity.net>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:48:01 +0000
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:     Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>
Cc:     'Jesper Dangaard Brouer' <brouer@...hat.com>,
        'Linux Kernel' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        'Linux-MM' <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm, page_allocator: Only use per-cpu allocator for
 irq-safe requests

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:14:29AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 6:16 PM Mel Gorman wrote: 
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 11:26:46AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, January 04, 2017 7:11 PM Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > @@ -2647,9 +2644,8 @@ static struct page *rmqueue_pcplist(struct zone *preferred_zone,
> > > >  	struct list_head *list;
> > > >  	bool cold = ((gfp_flags & __GFP_COLD) != 0);
> > > >  	struct page *page;
> > > > -	unsigned long flags;
> > > >
> > > > -	local_irq_save(flags);
> > > > +	preempt_disable();
> > > >  	pcp = &this_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset)->pcp;
> > > >  	list = &pcp->lists[migratetype];
> > > >  	page = __rmqueue_pcplist(zone,  order, gfp_flags, migratetype,
> > > > @@ -2658,7 +2654,7 @@ static struct page *rmqueue_pcplist(struct zone *preferred_zone,
> > > >  		__count_zid_vm_events(PGALLOC, page_zonenum(page), 1 << order);
> > > >  		zone_statistics(preferred_zone, zone, gfp_flags);
> > > >  	}
> > > > -	local_irq_restore(flags);
> > > > +	preempt_enable();
> > > >  	return page;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > With PREEMPT configured, preempt_enable() adds entry point to schedule().
> > > Is that needed when we try to allocate a page?
> > >
> > 
> > Not necessarily but what are you proposing as an alternative? 
> 
> preempt_enable_no_resched() looks at first glance a choice for us to 
> avoid flipping interrupts.
> 

Ok, I wasn't sure if you were proposing something more drastic. I can
make it this although I have no reason to believe it will really matter.
The path should be short enough that it's unlikely a scheduler event
would ever occur at that point. Still, no harm in doing what you
suggest.

Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ