[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41490c02-d87d-5ae1-9004-328e511a5656@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:04:21 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] media: venus: hfi: add Venus HFI files
On 12/05/2016 01:20 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On 12/05/2016 02:05 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 12/01/2016 10:03 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>> Here is the implementation of Venus video accelerator low-level
>>> functionality. It contanins code which setup the registers and
>>> startup uthe processor, allocate and manipulates with the shared
>>> memory used for sending commands and receiving messages.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c | 1508 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.h | 23 +
>>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus_io.h | 98 ++
>>> 3 files changed, 1629 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.h
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus_io.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..f004a9a80d85
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1508 @@
>>> +static int venus_tzbsp_set_video_state(enum tzbsp_video_state state)
>>> +{
>>> + return qcom_scm_video_set_state(state, 0);
>>
>> This functions doesn't seem to exist. Is there a prerequisite patch series that
>> introduces this function?
>
> yes, the patchset [1] is under review.
>
What is the status of this patchset?
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists